The Program Divorce Sprints are a Better Approach

Executive Summary

By the end of Day 3, all viable options have been identified and evaluated, most decisions have been made and locked, and any remaining gaps are clearly defined and limited in scope. The structure of the final outcome is largely determined—what remains is refinement, execution, and formal settlement.

Expected Outcomes

Clearly present choices, Find areas of agreement, Identify realistic options, Narrow down remaining differences
Read to Talk?

Day 3: The Engine of Resolution & Alignment

Day 3 is the inflection point of the Crivalo Method—the day where analysis and valuation give way to action, and where the outcome begins to take definitive shape. With a fully established financial foundation, the process moves directly into identifying and deciding.

The day begins with structured option generation. For each major issue, a limited set of viable paths is presented—asset division structures, buyout versus retention scenarios, support configurations where applicable, and real estate outcomes. These are not exploratory conversations; they are pre-vetted options grounded in the constraints and valuations already established. Non-viable paths are eliminated immediately, ensuring that all attention is focused on realistic, executable choices. At this stage, viable options are clearly identified and framed.

Scenario Modeling

Next, those options are evaluated through scenario modeling, allowing both parties to see side-by-side outcomes. The focus remains practical and decision-oriented—what each option means in terms of net worth, cash flow, and tax impact over time. The goal is not to overanalyze, but to create clarity and comparability. By the end of this phase, each option has been translated into a clear, understandable outcome.

Trade-Off Identification

With the scenarios visible, the process turns to trade-off identification. Every meaningful decision carries a trade-off—liquidity versus long-term growth, control versus diversification, immediate stability versus future upside. These trade-offs are made explicit, removing ambiguity and forcing clarity around what each party is prioritizing. Here, the real compromises are surfaced and understood.

Preference Alignment

From there, the focus shifts to preference alignment. Each party selects their preferred outcomes for each issue, independently and without negotiation. Points of alignment are immediately identified, while areas of divergence are isolated with precision. This step transforms abstract disagreement into clearly defined differences. At this point, alignment is captured and gaps are explicitly defined.

Decision Execution (Primary Issues)

With alignment established, the process moves quickly into decision execution on primary issues. Wherever both parties agree, decisions are locked immediately and removed from further discussion. High-impact items—those that influence multiple downstream decisions—are resolved first, creating momentum and simplifying the remaining work. By the end of this phase, the majority of decisions are made and firmly established.

Gap Resolution Strategy

Finally, attention turns to the remaining differences through a gap resolution strategy. Each open issue is addressed directly, with a defined path to closure—whether through financial offsets, structural adjustments, or conditional agreements. There is no open-ended negotiation; every gap is narrowed with intention and a clear target for resolution. At this stage, the remaining issues are contained, defined, and on a direct path to closure.

Itinerary

1. Option Identification

  • For each major issue, define the viable paths forward
  • Advisors present structured options based on prior analysis and valuations
  • Eliminate clearly unworkable options immediately

2. Option Framing

Standardize how each option is presented:

  • What changes hands
  • Timing of transfers
  • Structural components (buyout, retain, divide, etc.)
  • Ensure both parties are reviewing options in a consistent format

3. Preference Selection

  • Each party identifies preferred outcomes for each issue
  • No negotiation yet—just clear selection of direction
  • Capture alignment vs. divergence

4. Decision Locking (Aligned Items)

  • Immediately lock all items where both parties align
  • Remove resolved issues from further discussion
  • Build momentum through completed decisions

5. Gap Identification

  • Isolate remaining areas of disagreement
  • Define the exact difference between positions (not general conflict)
  • Reduce all open issues to a short, precise list

6. Decision Path Forward

  • Establish how remaining gaps will be resolved:
  • What needs to change for agreement
  • What trade-offs are available

Set up Day 4 to finalize and optimize remaining decisions

End of Day 3 Outcome\

  • All viable options clearly defined
  • Aligned decisions locked
  • Remaining gaps isolated and specific
  • Clear path to full resolution
  • At the end of Day 3, there is no ambiguity—only a small number of defined decisions left to close.

Are you Ready to Learn More?

Let's start with a conversation. No sales pitch. This is a specialized and customized set of highly sophisticated services. It begins with a phone call.